Common LISP Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words

Common LISP - Research Paper Example Table 1 shows some of the mostly used implementations of Common Lisp (Daniel, 2010). Common Lisp has been the chosen Lisp dialect in various development industries worldwide. One such industry is the Web. Some online shopping sites such as â€Å"Yahoo! Store† provide its users with a WYSIWYG editor for editing their online store through any standard web browser (Graham 2003). This editor is developed in Common Lisp. CL-HTTP is public domain web server developed by MIT Artificial Intelligence Lab. Some big companies such as AT&T have been using Common Lisp in their telecom systems. A UK based company, Harlequin, is known to have provided Common Lisp based products and consultancy services to AT&T (Kantrowitz 1994). Xanalys Ltd is another giant company that has been using Common Lisp within their application products. Xanalys LinkEXPLORER, is one of their products that is developed in LispWorks (an implementation of Common Lisp) (Levine & Pitman 2010). Besides being used in internet web services, telecom industry, document translation, fraud detection in credit cards as well as crime investigation, CL has successfully been used in applications related to analysis of investments, finances, tracking of trends in stock markets, airline scheduling systems, space exploration, robotics, process planning, process scheduling, chemistry, physics and medicine. All these discussed application areas have a common trait; the problem structure is usually too complex. The following discussion depicts the situations where it is generally advised to use CL to simplify complex problems. Common Lisp has been used in the field of Artificial Intelligence since its inception. Although it may not be an optimal solution for common problems involving bulk processing based on clear cut, well defined data, yet it can still be used in these system. In a business accounting system that usually involves straight

Discuss supreme court case Korematsu v. United States (1944) Essay

Discuss supreme court case Korematsu v. United States (1944) - Essay Example This was quite an irrational decision because there was no evidence that these individuals were a threat to the national security of US. Walter Lippmann a well renowned columnist stated that no individual is allowed to conduct business and no individual has a right to obtain residence during a war. During the month of February of 1942, the president of US, Roosevelt accepted and signed the Executive Order 9066 (Niiya, 1993, p.16). This order provided the secretary of war with the authority to recognize certain areas as war zones and due to this label the people living in that area may be removed and restrictions of travelling within that area were even applied. Later, the in charge of the Western Defense Command labeled the entire region of the Pacific Coast as area of military due to its higher probability of being attacked (Bangarth, 2008, p.22). This led to implementation of curfews after which Japanese Americans were initially restricted to leave the area and later evacuated from the region. Later these individuals were held in prison camps because it was believed that all Japanese Americans are traitors. These actions taken by the US government were challenged in the case of Korematsu v. United States (1944) and the outcome of this case was that although the justices of t his case accepted that it was necessary for the military to relocate the Japanese Americans and the court accepted the decision taken by the government to detain Korematsu (Polenberg, 2000, p.197). The court legalized the actions taken by the government because the court believed that the action was taken as US was at war with Japan and it was correct to believe that Japanese American could involve in sabotage. The decision taken by the court during this case was quite significant in nature as the decision clearly stated that the government of US had the right to take any action such as evacuating people from their areas on racial basis. The decision even clearly stated that wartime